miraje: (kick me)
[personal profile] miraje
In this paper, Ruddiman basically calls the validity of the methods and conclusions of the SPECMAP model into question and offers a different approach that incorporates the older CLIMAP model’s implications with the SPECMAP’s d18O data. Most of his arguments against SPECMAP’s “training energy” theory involve inconsistencies of the time scale of its implied climatic fluctuations with the phases of the Earth axis’s rotation, specifically phases of obliquity, precession, and eccentricity. He also points out a sparcity of physical evidence for points that are used to form the SPECMAP conclusions. He claims that these issues are “fatal” problems of the SPECMAP model, and offers the previously mentioned approach as a better-fitting alternative.

*blank stare* I just spent the last two hours reading 25 pages of a painfully technical research journal article to turn in a whopping 4-sentence summary. School sucks.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-20 11:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] airor.livejournal.com
Yeah, but do you agree with him?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-21 12:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miraje.livejournal.com
As an undergraduate taking the course, we are not required to critique the material. We just write short summaries to prove that we actually read it and also write one question to raise in class about it. My question had to do with a seemingly arbitrary time shift Ruddiman used to get the phases to match up with the Oxygen-18 data while not addressing whether that caused any significant inconsistency with existing physical climate records.

I can't really say who I agree with more since I have not read any literature from the SPECMAP side. Ruddiman's points seem to generally be valid ones, but I can't say I know enough about the science to form opinions on it.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-21 12:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asheypp.livejournal.com
wow. that's all way over my head....way over!

heather...you so smaht

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-21 01:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miraje.livejournal.com
Ha, it made sense when I wrote it, but now I keep reading through it and wondering if it has any coherence whatsoever. There's a hugely long sentence in the middle that seems to make absolutely no sense every time I try to read it. Methinks some changes are in order!

Profile

miraje: (Default)
miraje

February 2010

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags